Indeed, perhaps all articles should be marked as stubs until they have at least one revision by a contributor who was not the original creator. This will automatically catch any auto-generated articles.
Neil
Maybe I have not understood *at all* what a stub was ???
I thought it was a very short article, in bad need of being expanded ???
Are you not confusing *stub* with *not-reviewed articles* here ?
If such a decision is taken, we'll have to set up a new page "articles to be absolutely reviewed not to be confused with stubs". I have a handful of articles which I believe have never been edited by anybody. I certainly would feel very insulted if they were listed as stubs.
There is a need to catch automatically generated articles, but not that way.
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/