Andre Engels wrote:
It would be like Larousse adding the number in the Petit Larousse and the Grand Larousse, or the publisher of English-XXX dictionaries adding up all languages. Having many languages available is certainly a good thing, but just adding up the numbers gives a wholly false image.
That's why we would say that we have 300,000 articles spread across 50 different languages. We would then list the top 10 or so with their article counts. How is that /at all/ presenting a false image? See my last email about acknowledging community effort.
-- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)