Andre Engels wrote:
It would be like Larousse adding the number in
the Petit Larousse and the Grand Larousse, or
the publisher of English-XXX dictionaries adding
up all languages. Having many languages available
is certainly a good thing, but just adding up the
numbers gives a wholly false image.
That's why we would say that we have 300,000 articles spread across 50
different languages. We would then list the top 10 or so with their article
counts. How is that /at all/ presenting a false image? See my last email
about acknowledging community effort.
-- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)