Hi,
Same problem again: "Wikipedia cannot hold itself out as
quintessential authority...". Now, I don't know that Wikipedia *does*
do that. But people obviously have that perception. Time for a
"Wikipedia does not guarantee the veracity of its content. Please fix or
alert us to any errors that you find." disclaimer in big letters on
every page.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: wikipedia-l-bounces(a)Wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces@Wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Gray
Sent: Monday, 12th December 2005 10:43 PM
To: wikipedia-l(a)wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Wikipedia Class Action
On 12/12/05, Anthony DiPierro <wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
It'll be interesting to see if someone tries to force them
to remove
the trademarked Wikipedia logo from that site.
Other than that, Seigenthaler has said he's not interested in suing
the foundation (and his lawyers have apparently informed
him that he'd
fail due to the CDA). I wonder if anyone else is
going to come
forward in the first place, you know, someone with standing to
actually sue. I also wonder who it is that's running this site.
(whois Registrant Name: Legal Department)
The Village Pump solves the problem, thanks to [[User:Interiot]]:
"It looks like the the site is set up by QuakeAID (WHOIS
tie-ins here), because they have long-standing complaints
about Wikipedia's coverage of them"
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org