Hi, Same problem again: "Wikipedia cannot hold itself out as quintessential authority...". Now, I don't know that Wikipedia *does* do that. But people obviously have that perception. Time for a "Wikipedia does not guarantee the veracity of its content. Please fix or alert us to any errors that you find." disclaimer in big letters on every page.
Steve
-----Original Message----- From: wikipedia-l-bounces@Wikimedia.org [mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces@Wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Gray Sent: Monday, 12th December 2005 10:43 PM To: wikipedia-l@wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Wikipedia Class Action
On 12/12/05, Anthony DiPierro wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
It'll be interesting to see if someone tries to force them
to remove
the trademarked Wikipedia logo from that site.
Other than that, Seigenthaler has said he's not interested in suing the foundation (and his lawyers have apparently informed
him that he'd
fail due to the CDA). I wonder if anyone else is going to come forward in the first place, you know, someone with standing to actually sue. I also wonder who it is that's running this site. (whois Registrant Name: Legal Department)
The Village Pump solves the problem, thanks to [[User:Interiot]]:
"It looks like the the site is set up by QuakeAID (WHOIS tie-ins here), because they have long-standing complaints about Wikipedia's coverage of them"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:QuakeAID#Whois_WikipediaClassAction.or g http://news.baou.com/main.php?action=recent&rid=20675
-- - Andrew Gray andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l