On 1 Oct 2003, Erik Moeller wrote:
Andre-
No, but some have voted in the reasonable
expectation that their vote was
valid, whereas it was not.
I don't have time to validate votes beyond the rules as they were clearly
laid out on the voting page. If you wish to post-vote validate some
ballots, go ahead and do it. In the case of the ~~~~ votes, this includes
checking the history and locating the exact revision where this text was
added, then checking which username made the addition (and only counting
it if it was in fact a username, and not an anonymous IP). Have fun.
I already did, see
http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/intlwiki-l/2003-September/002338.html
where I have checked the various removed votes, and given my opinion about
them.
I did not check the votes on other languages there, so I will have to
check a bit more.
-------------------
I'm not accepting the results if not included:
* Kpjas
Links to his en: page, just uses a link that worked when he created it
2 years ago, but does not any more. Apart from that an ancient and
well-known wikipedian.
-------------------
Certainly in favor of inclusion:
* JDG
Clearly identifies himself on his meta: user page as the en: user of the
same nick.
* first anonymous user (=en:Dramatic)
* second anonmyous user (=en:Tillwe)
Signing with ~~~~ between =='s
* de:Benutzer:korny78
* de:Benutzer:Hafenbar
* de:Benutzer:wst
Link directly to their page on de: and that was the purpose, wasn't it, to
be sure they were a user with some contributions on some wikipedia?
* Gaucho
Typo in his link to his de: userpage
-------------------
Probably want to include:
* Pacific1982
* F. P. Laussy (Laussy)
Clearly the same person as the en: user with the same username. No
identification on their meta: user page as to which Wikipedia they are
coming from though.
* RodrigoB
Believably identifies himself as an anonymous contributor on en:
-------------------
Agree with removal:
* Mjanich
* Juky
* Elliott
* Heymarcel
* Skrrytch
* Dishayloo
* bzwische
* Ralph
Have no meta page
* bluenote
* PierreC
* Tempshill
* Richa B
Meta page does not inform from which Wikipedia they are
* GillianAnderson
First edit (at least under this name) on de: was several days after the
closing of the voting period)
======================================================================
For the count:
Here is the extra points the various proposals get with those I certainly
want to include. All have 7 votes, unless otherwise specified.
* 1a: 24
* 1b: 17
* 2a: 15
* 2b: 20
* 2c: 17
* 2d: 16
* 2e: 17
* 3a: 20
* 3b: 19
* 4a: 14
* 4b: 17
* 4c: 17
* 4d: 18
* 5a: 14
* 5b: 11
* 5c: 14
* 5d: 13
* 5e: 11
* 6a: 25 (from 8 votes)
* 6b: 21 (from 8 votes)
* 6c: 15
* 7a: 12
* 7b: 9
* 7c: 9
* 7d: 11
* 7e: 11
* 8: 21
* 9a: 11
* 9b: 10
* 9c: 10
* 9d: 10
* 9e: 10
* 10: 21
* 11: 14 (from 6 votes)
* 0: 17
And here with also those I probably want to include. All have 10 votes unless
otherwise specified.
* 1a: 34
* 1b: 25
* 2a: 20
* 2b: 24
* 2c: 21
* 2d: 20
* 2e: 21
* 3a: 25
* 3b: 24
* 4a: 22
* 4b: 22
* 4c: 22
* 4d: 25
* 5a: 22
* 5b: 18
* 5c: 25
* 5d: 21
* 5e: 22
* 6a: 32 (from 11 votes)
* 6b: 28 (from 11 votes)
* 6c: 23
* 7a: 17
* 7b: 14
* 7c: 14
* 7d: 16
* 7e: 16
* 8: 32
* 9a: 19
* 9b: 18
* 9c: 18
* 9d: 18
* 9e: 18
* 10: 25
* 11: 17 (from 9 votes)
* 0: 23
Andre Engels