Optim <optim81(a)yahoo.co.uk> writes:
Do you think it's true?
No. I've seen no evidence of this process.
and how can we answer this argument?
Ask him why an average person would wish to ruin a good article?
And why the community would then leave those detrimental changes unreverted.
Furthermore, ask them to point out a selection of good articles that was
edited to averageness by the intervention of the mediocre.
Theories that don't have confirming instances may cheerfully be disregarded.
"The best lack all conviction and the worst are full of passionate intensity"
-- W. B. Yeats forsees the standard of debate on wikipedia-l