On sab, 2003-01-18 at 05:55, X. Cunc wrote:
Consensus is the way to reach decision on
Wikipedia.
Not voting.
Yes, but if we don't know what the range of opinions
is, it'll be rather
difficult to say whether there's a consensus. A
'vote' is useful as a
straw poll for that, no?
C'est par le consensus que les décisions
devraient
être prises sur Wikipédia. Pas par le vote.
Oui, mais si personne ne sais quelle et la
distribution des opinions, ce
serait très difficile � dire si existe un
consensus. Pour ça, le 'vote'
est utile, non?
-- brion vibber (brion @
pobox.com)
Yeah sure. As a poll. Not as a decision. Only that is
not clear to most internationals.
And...on which basis will we say there is consensus or
not ?
When I enter a voting place in France, I know what is
the pourcentage required for a proposition to be
rejected or not. Here nobody knows, for it has never
been discussed through which process the decision
would be taken.
What is that way of doing, "voting" without knowing
what will be done with the "votes" ???
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.