If Wikipedias with no native contributors are so evil, why don't you request locking of the over 100 Wikipedias for which this is the case?
You might say that none of them have any people writing, but that is not true. Wikipedias such as the Lingala Wikipedia (ln.wp) are filled with content created by non-native speakers, and you aren't complaining about them. Why is that? Why don't you go on a crusade to close the Lingala Wikipedia? Or the Maori Wikipedia?
Mark
On 29/06/06, Jacky PB dpotop1@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello Gerard,
I don't really understand what you are implying.
But I can repeat why we ask for the deletion of mo.wikipedia (all of these are already proven in previous messages):
- There is no community. Nobody on wikipedia is both
interested in having it and able to contribute.
- All content is copied from ro.wikipedia and
transliterated. There are better, already tested ways of changing script, if someone wants it.
- In the current status, mo.wikipedia is in fact a
heaven for trolls of all sorts.
Of course, deletion needs not be permanent. As soon as the condition 1 becomes false (as soon as a community forms), the moldovan wikipedia can be re-created.
Yours, Jacky
--- Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
... The big issue comes mainly from the
desinformation that mo.wikipediacreates.
The content that is currently on mo.wikipedia is
written in a language that
is not used any more in the Republic of Moldova.
It could be argued that
Moldovan is used by a minority in the territory of
Moldova (in private and
personal matters), and by a part of population
(mainly Moldovan schools) in
Transnistria. Please note that Cyrillic Moldovan
is not used on a large
scale (that is, generally speaking, you won't
encounter Moldovan Cyrillic
anywhere in Moldova). At least for Moldova, I can
assure you, as I am a
native Moldovan. As far as Transnistria is
concerned, I really doubt it.
Even the official presidential website http://www.president-pmr.org/doesn't contain any Cyrillic Moldovan content. ...
Hoi, Either the information is correct, and given that it is said to be information from the Romanian language Wikipedia it should be both correct and NPOV. If it is not correct or NPOV, /both/ the Romanian and the Moldovian language Wikipedia are to be considered problematic. All the rest is very much politics, posturing and intransigence.
I am sure that this continued existence is best ignored. Consider you are either a party to this dispute or you could not care less. When the argument is that the mo wikipedia is occupied by trolls, remember they thrive by getting attention.
Thanks, GerardM _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l