But Andre, its way more effective to hi-jack *all* threads and steer
them towards a lot of talk about deletionist/admin reform ....and then
propose nothing actionable. =)
Not dismissing you, Cunctator. I agree on all counts. Its just
something I notice on this list.
Andre. That was far from clear, buddy. Thanks for clarifying.
-S
On 3/8/07, Andre Engels <andreengels(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think I was quite clear. If you want to change
policy, then start a thread
about that, but don't post them on a thread about a fully unrelated problem
and pretend that everything suddenly is fine if we just do what you want.
2007/3/8, The Cunctator <cunctator(a)gmail.com>om>:
Huh? What was that about?
On 3/8/07, Andre Engels <andreengels(a)gmail.com> wrote:
SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!! As if answering to your pet peeves would solve all
problems in the fucking Wikipedia!!!
2007/3/8, The Cunctator <cunctator(a)gmail.com>om>:
Automatically make a lot more people admins.
Stop deleting so many things under the "notability" excuse.
Assume Good Faith from contributors.
Don't ban newbies under the SPA excuse.
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
--
Andre Engels, andreengels(a)gmail.com
ICQ: 6260644 -- Skype: a_engels
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
--
Andre Engels, andreengels(a)gmail.com
ICQ: 6260644 -- Skype: a_engels
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l