Jens Ropers wrote:
Like the mild napalm-bombing of civilians?
Apparently you are either an idiot or read indymedia for your news, as
Napalm has not been used in a war for decades.
Meanwhile, the atrocities in Tibet are well documented.
In any case, the point is that the en: wikipedia should have documented
US atrocities, like [[Abu Ghraib]], and the zh: Wikipedia should have
documented Chinese atrocities. Advocating removing either of them is
unacceptable.
-Mark