Seems, that you assign somedy else's thoughts to me, which is not a good habit. I have never told Romanian (and/or Modovan) is a Slavic language.
As for the myth about this or that alfabet fitting better or worse to this or that language, I even don't wont to discuss it. A good alphabet is a phonematic one ("one phoneme" <--> "one symbol"), and the shape of letters is just an accessory thing.
2005/12/5, Wikipedia Romania (Ronline) rowikipedia@gmail.com:
You probably don't know the history of the language well. In fact both Romanian and Moldovans has been Orthodox Christians and used Cyrillic script for several ages. The modern Latin script is relatively a news in both lands. So one can's speak in such a self-confindent way about Moldovan Cyrillics as "decreed in the unfree days". By the way, do you know much about the unfree days? They were not totally that "unfree". :) Be more neutral. ;)
For some reason, Slavic people seem to think that "Romania is really just a Slavic language that has only recently tried to affirm itself as Latin/Romance". Not only you, but others as well. Romanian, while influenced by Slavic languages to a degree, is still overwhelmingly Romance and the Latin alphabet is the best alphabet to represent it...
-- Esperu cxiam!