At 07:29 AM 7/27/02 -0700, you wrote:
Neil Harris wrote:
>(Name of issue here) is a [[controversial
issue]], with widely differing
points of
view... &c.
"'''Evolution''' is a [[controversial issue]],
with widely differing points of view."
"The '''theory of relativity''' is a
[[controversial
issue]],
with widely differing points of view."
"The '''heliocentric model of the solar system'''
is a
[[controversial
issue]],
with widely differing points of view."
I think that an honest admission, in '' like
disambiguation page notices,
that the article is not *yet* NPOV is preferable.
Also, of course, "'''God''' is a [[controversial
issue]], with widely
differing points of view",
"'''Democracy''' is a [[controversial issue]], with
widely differing points
of view",
and so on for all religious and political topics.
Seriously. Evolution isn't half as controversial as
whether Jesus is God.
Exactly. I think half the articles in the database
could bear that label. We would have to set up a page
for the discussion of which topics are controversial
enough for the warning, and then the discussion page
itself would need to be marked with its own
disclaimer. :P
- Stephen G.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better