I understand the choice issue regarding this type of dual license.
Basically, what I was trying to say is that you limit the commercial
interoperability with other CC licenses.
Thank you for helping me clear it up! ;-)
Sigmaman
On 2/27/07, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 27/02/07, sigmaman <sigmaman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everyone!
This is the first time I have responded to a thread. I am curious.. how
common is dual licensing using the GDFL + (CC) license? Using the GFDL
and
CC-BY-NC-SA seems to be kind of a neat idea, for
at least some uses. You
could severly limit commercial uses with such a combo, while serving
Wikipedia needs and demands. It's just a neat idea that I have not come
across!
Well, you couldn't limit commercial uses any more than they were
limited simply by GFDL licensing. Remember that CC-NC plus GFDL
doesn't give you a combination of the both, just a choice. (in other
words, you end up with easier use for noncommercial, or commercial
only-if-they-use-GFDL, not some kind of GFDL-NC)
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l