From: Toby Bartels toby+wikipedia@math.ucr.edu Larry has already suggested that Nupedia might act like this; well, we could have a site that covers Team Nupedia and a bunch of other certification teams too, if there's interest.
OK, two comments: (1) while I and others have often said in the past that Nupedia is perfectly free to use Wikipedia articles, and even that Nupedia could serve as a Wikipedia-vetting project, that is *not* my most recent proposal. Most recently I specifically said that we probably shouldn't impose on Nupedia to act as a filter for Wikipedia. The main reason for this is simply that that isn't what the many good people who signed up for the Nupedia project signed up for; they'd be furious if I tried to hijack their project that way, even if it's a project that isn't currently going anywhere.
(2) No offense but I really don't want any "team" of reviewers that I help organize associated with other (nonprofessional) reviewing "teams" as designated by Wikipedia. That essentially defeats the purpose of the proposal, viz., to use Wikipedia-created materials to create a *clearly more credible*, mother-, teacher-, and librarian-approved resource. I'm not saying there couldn't be any other reviewing scheme in place, just that the professional-level reviewing body should not "just another Wikipedia reviewing team." That entails that it should just be as completely independent of Wikipedia.
Larry