From: Toby Bartels
<toby+wikipedia(a)math.ucr.edu>
Larry has already suggested that Nupedia might act like this;
well, we could have a site that covers Team Nupedia
and a bunch of other certification teams too,
if there's interest.
OK, two comments: (1) while I and others have often said in the past that
Nupedia is perfectly free to use Wikipedia articles, and even that Nupedia
could serve as a Wikipedia-vetting project, that is *not* my most recent
proposal. Most recently I specifically said that we probably shouldn't
impose on Nupedia to act as a filter for Wikipedia. The main reason for
this is simply that that isn't what the many good people who signed up for
the Nupedia project signed up for; they'd be furious if I tried to hijack
their project that way, even if it's a project that isn't currently going
anywhere.
(2) No offense but I really don't want any "team" of reviewers that I help
organize associated with other (nonprofessional) reviewing "teams" as
designated by Wikipedia. That essentially defeats the purpose of the
proposal, viz., to use Wikipedia-created materials to create a *clearly
more credible*, mother-, teacher-, and librarian-approved resource. I'm
not saying there couldn't be any other reviewing scheme in place, just
that the professional-level reviewing body should not "just another
Wikipedia reviewing team." That entails that it should just be as
completely independent of Wikipedia.
Larry