Andre Engels wrote:
On 9/28/05, Phroziac phroziac@gmail.com wrote:
Most conlangs should not even be considered. But, certainly there are conlangs that are as notable as Esperanto, which we don't have wikipedias for?
I don't think there is any other conlang "as notable as Esperanto". Wikipedia currently exists in Esperanto, Interlingua, Ido, Lojban and Volapük, although the last two aren't very big.
I looked at ISO 639-3 and it proposes to recognize 24 conlangs: http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Afrihili&action=editAfrihili, Brithenig, Ceqli, Delason, Dutton World Speedwords, Esperanto, Glosa, Ido, Interglossa, Interlingua, Interlingue, Jakelimotu, Klingon, Láadan, Linga, Lojban, Novial, Occidental, Orcish, Quenya, Romanova, Sindarin, Tceqli, and Volapük This unfortunately includes Klingon. Toki Pona is not on the list. It looks as though they have dropped Europanto. It does put their reliability in doubt.
Ec