From: "Tony Sidaway" minorityreport@bluebottle.com Reply-To: minorityreport@bluebottle.com, wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org To: wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Autofellatio Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:28:52 +0100 (BST)
Wouter Steenbeek said:
Now more concrete on the picture itself: If there is an encyclopedic article on a sexual topic in which a picture of someone doing a blow job on himself is or might be relevant, then we must maintain the article, otherwise we shouldn't, because it can only be abused. The case is that simple in my view. (Correct me if I'm wrong, I am a relative newbe...)
Well most people decided it shouldn't be on Wikipedia, whether because they suspected it was a copyright violation, they thought it was too open to abuse, or they didn't think it was suitable for Wikipedia. Quadell has closed the discussion, deleted the image, and removed the link from the article. I'm happy with this outcome. The image was deleted by consensus.
So am I, don't get me wrong. The image was said to be copyrighted and I don't see any opportunity to include the picture (perhaps in [[Back Troubles]]...). If the picture was re-added by the same guy (very probably it was a guy) who uploaded it first, then block him, for he will very likely be the vandal who put it on everyone's Talk pages as well. However, I must express a certain admiration for this creative way of vandalism... (which is in no way meant to justify it!)
_________________________________________________________________ MSN Webmessenger doet het altijd en overal http://webmessenger.msn.com/