From: "Tony Sidaway"
<minorityreport(a)bluebottle.com>
Reply-To: minorityreport(a)bluebottle.com, wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
To: <wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Autofellatio
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:28:52 +0100 (BST)
Wouter Steenbeek said:
Now more concrete on the picture itself: If there is an encyclopedic
article on a sexual topic in which a picture of someone doing a blow
job on himself is or might be relevant, then we must maintain the
article, otherwise we shouldn't, because it can only be abused. The
case is that simple in my view. (Correct me if I'm wrong, I am a
relative newbe...)
Well most people decided it shouldn't be on Wikipedia, whether because
they suspected it was a copyright violation, they thought it was too open
to abuse, or they didn't think it was suitable for Wikipedia. Quadell has
closed the discussion, deleted the image, and removed the link from the
article.
I'm happy with this outcome. The image was deleted by consensus.
So am I, don't get me wrong. The image was said to be copyrighted and I
don't see any opportunity to include the picture (perhaps in [[Back
Troubles]]...). If the picture was re-added by the same guy (very probably
it was a guy) who uploaded it first, then block him, for he will very likely
be the vandal who put it on everyone's Talk pages as well. However, I must
express a certain admiration for this creative way of vandalism... (which is
in no way meant to justify it!)
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Webmessenger doet het altijd en overal