Daniel Mayer wrote:
--- Ray Saintonge
<saintonge-EynCeXvFgoheoWH0uzbU5w(a)public.gmane.org>
wrote:
>Anthere wrote:
>
>
>>http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedians_by_MBTI_type
>>
>>How do you explain the current majority of NTs ?
>>
>>
>
>Wikipedians are not a representative sample of the
general population. 8-)
Ec
NTs are to Wikipedia as flies are to fly paper (or
moths to a flame). ;)
-- mav
Hmmmmmm.
Well, I hope more people will add themselves so we
improve statistics.
But after we noticed an apparent predominance of NT,
who think of
* why are those predominant ? What is the positive
feedback given to them and not given to others ?
* Are the other groups not attracted by WP ? Or are
they quickly leaving because they can't meet their
needs ?
* is it good for wikipedia community that mostly NT
are here ? Would not we benefit of more types ? How to
attract them and *keep* them ?
* who are the groups more embarassed with trolls ? Who
could better help best with wikistress attacks ?
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/