Daniel Mayer wrote:
--- Ray Saintonge
saintonge-EynCeXvFgoheoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org wrote:
Anthere wrote:
http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedians_by_MBTI_type
How do you explain the current majority of NTs ?
Wikipedians are not a representative sample of the
general population. 8-)
Ec
NTs are to Wikipedia as flies are to fly paper (or
moths to a flame). ;)
-- mav
Hmmmmmm. Well, I hope more people will add themselves so we improve statistics.
But after we noticed an apparent predominance of NT, who think of
* why are those predominant ? What is the positive feedback given to them and not given to others ?
* Are the other groups not attracted by WP ? Or are they quickly leaving because they can't meet their needs ?
* is it good for wikipedia community that mostly NT are here ? Would not we benefit of more types ? How to attract them and *keep* them ?
* who are the groups more embarassed with trolls ? Who could better help best with wikistress attacks ?
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/