On 4/15/07, Berto 'd Sera albertoserra@ukr.net wrote:
Communities are free to publish what they wish in principle, and wmf is free to decide whether this is wiki or not. If not then the project cannot use a wikipedia trademark. Apart from that any community is obviously free to publish a fully creationist wiki, a pro-terrorism wiki, a "kill-them-niggers" wiki or whatever else.
Only if they wish to go that way they must do it under their own logo and they must pay for servers, development and bandwidth from their own wallets. They also have to deal with the cops themselves, since some of these POVs are treated as crimes in some nations.
Berto 'd Sera Personagi dl'ann 2006 per l'arvista american-a Time (tanme tuti vojaotri) http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1569514,00.html
The best part of this discussion up to now. While fully agree with it we may evaluate if the local wikipedia is being well maintained on other subjects. Having a handful of bad articles around may be a bearable price for an otherwise fair and growing local wikipedia. On the other hand, if the administrators just took the Romanian wikipedia as a free add service, expel them all.
Krohon