-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Wikipedia Romania (Ronline) wrote:
Hi,
As a bystander here I am really, really confused about
Zlatiborian!
Now, could someone please translate what Djordje wrote
on the sr.wiki. An honest translation. There are
reasonable grounds to believe this is a hoax, for a
few reasons:
*Djordje's backtracking over this project with
statements like "I'm sorry, it was a hoax"
*Node's expression of "noble" language, etc, which
makes it seem very much like a joke (honestly...)
*The most important point - there are NO internet
sources on this language. None at all! Surely if this
was an actual language, there would be at least one
source calling it Zlatiborian.
Node - you said that you have some books on this
language, and you seem to know quite a lot about it
(vocabulary differences, etc). Are there any sources
on the Internet about this? And proof?
In conclusion - I'm not against the Zlatiborian
Wikipedia, but I'm really in doubt over whether it
actually exists.
I could share with you some very interesting channel logs from
#wikipedia... assuming that the "node_ue" I was talking to was indeed
Mark Williamson, and they were being serious, then yes, Zlatiborian is
indeed a hoax. That, or... well, I'm almost beyond words.
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3-cvs (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQEVAwUBQ28B4bMAAH8MeUlWAQivHAgAqJQ5hHfAKnbq8V5taNf6mBaHgspeUhuV
KqrvGs2TGMd0GvZm0uGjdgJPG/horcwtep1ZAbWCYZzCRUs3hxYSd0STXY5Sy31B
EE6WbDHN+b2tt51tPhwXfga8msv6ULm7vQho4AnWW6mPWlY4iUmG3VO8rjh1usPA
CZdN1rhsYmkdzrDvnmMQ1OhppBtVX9swog7ozXYNVw7YzW4CrSrB3+/71UEhwDXH
RY+ONO8xD9bYppJ5nBfDAjbfjFLyCXiH4LumwUhhbnpFPkE3qQqN8xAlVmn5Uk29
dPfZ7CETAQU50KItrn8B0bYxw+kfidjfr2tOE+OsO3LCo2qCcRUwGQ==
=2Y7/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----