On 5/25/05, Jean-Baptiste Soufron <jbsoufron(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Given the importance of clear copyright rules on
wikipedia, this
statement has exactly a 0 legal value. What we should get is at least
a non-exclusive license granted to wikipedia.
Also, I thought we were not only talking about copyright of uk public
servants, but about copyright of uk authors at large before 1954... ?
We were discussing only Crown Copyright; i.e. UK government-owned copyright.
-Matt (User:Morven)