Jimmy Wales wrote:
the comma count
: 109062
for length > 0 : 116199 <-
for length > 500: 90991
This is interesting.
What would be *really* useful is a "diff" between each two of these, so
we could see which ">0" articles don't contain a comma, so we can fix
them (well, I know how to do that, but SQL is not everyone's favourite;-)
We'd need to cache these diff pages, though, because of the full-text
search :-(
Magnus