--- "James R. Johnson" <modean52(a)comcast.net> wrote:
Mav is right about wikispecies, and I propose also
that we should say his
logic should apply to wiktionary. We don't need a wiktionary, since all
that information is in the wikipedia already. It's a duplication of
efforts, and dilutes our efforts and contributors's time. Let's get rid of
it.
That is a total strawman since Wiktionary defines *all* words or *all*
languages. There are only a small handful of words in Wikipedia that have
articles about them but they are *not* dictionary definitions, they are
encyclopedia articles.
Any other weak arguments?
-- Marv
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com