--- "James R. Johnson" modean52@comcast.net wrote:
Mav is right about wikispecies, and I propose also that we should say his logic should apply to wiktionary. We don't need a wiktionary, since all that information is in the wikipedia already. It's a duplication of efforts, and dilutes our efforts and contributors's time. Let's get rid of it.
That is a total strawman since Wiktionary defines *all* words or *all* languages. There are only a small handful of words in Wikipedia that have articles about them but they are *not* dictionary definitions, they are encyclopedia articles.
Any other weak arguments?
-- Marv
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com