Michael R. Irwin wrote:
If this article is representative, then yes, I also think our current process of collaboratively editing (or edit warring) the current pages could be overwhelmed for a while, even with a trickle of articles.
It wasn't representative, it was a particularly bad example. Others have wisely pointed out that some of what they have is not so biased.
The biographies aren't bad at all. Pretty much we just have to watch for things like calling Milton Friedman "conservative" and calling mainstream economics "bourgois economcis". Those are easy terminology fixes, though.
Personally I do not see this as a new issue. Our current process routinely serves biased or non NPOV material on the current page until editors get around to editing it.
That's right. If they were to dump things in too fast, though, it would be hard to digest and some of it would end up getting neglected. Usually, things that manage to scroll off the recent changes pages end up pretty stable.
--Jimbo