Michael R. Irwin wrote:
If this article is representative, then yes, I also
think our
current process of collaboratively editing (or edit warring) the
current pages could be overwhelmed for a while, even with a
trickle of articles.
It wasn't representative, it was a particularly bad example. Others
have wisely pointed out that some of what they have is not so biased.
The biographies aren't bad at all. Pretty much we just have to watch
for things like calling Milton Friedman "conservative" and calling
mainstream economics "bourgois economcis". Those are easy terminology
fixes, though.
Personally I do not see this as a new issue. Our
current
process routinely serves biased or non NPOV material
on the current page until editors get around to editing it.
That's right. If they were to dump things in too fast, though,
it would be hard to digest and some of it would end up getting
neglected. Usually, things that manage to scroll off the recent
changes pages end up pretty stable.
--Jimbo