Erik Moeller wrote:
For the first stage, we simply assume that there's
no significant level of
cheating. This assumption may be wrong, but I doubt it. Keep in mind that
the logo contest was advertised on the Main Pages of several Wikipedias.
That means that it was one of the first things that many people saw of
Wikipedia, and some of them probably thought: logo contest? That sounds
interesting! And a minority of these people probably managed to get some
votes in by figuring out how to edit the page.
I don't think that's a big deal, and the outcome so far pretty much
reflects my personal feelings (most people did not like the hydra,
unfortunately!), but because we have actual prizes in this contest, we'll
take better care to prevent cheating in the second stage. I hope that's a
satisfactory solution. I encourage you and others to filter out non-
existent users from the voting results to see if the results differ
significantly.
I still think that before we go on to a second round we need a report on
each short list item that addresses
1. Whether there are any technical problems in such matters as
scaling ,
2. Whether there are conflicts with anyone else's logo, including
trademark violations, and
3. Where a short listed item has multiple variants, how we choose
between variants
Ec