Sure. No prob.
But, what are you exactly
disagreeing
with ? Removal of superfluous hair practices or
"esquisses-stubs" ???
Je vais le dire en fran�ais pour �tre s�r
d'�tre
compris.
Certains article ont �t� �crit de mani�re clairement
non NPOV. Et je
maintiens que les d�lire de philippe sur les
homosexuels, transexuels,
juifs et autres me cassaient les couilles car ils
n'avaient pas leur
place dans wikipedia � ce titre.
Nod. I entirely agree with you. The encyclopedia
should stay crystal clear. I trust wikipedians to keep
it a very clean place, with a zero tolerance of
anything that could disturb our peace. No racism, no
sexism, no faschism, no extremism, no nuclearism, no
anti-joseboverism, no anti-anarchism...pouah, horrible
!
Thank god, we are still allowing sex-related articles
! Good anchor for reality.
Amicalement
Ant
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com