Sure. No prob. But, what are you exactly
disagreeing
with ? Removal of superfluous hair practices or "esquisses-stubs" ???
Je vais le dire en fran�ais pour �tre s�r d'�tre compris.
Certains article ont �t� �crit de mani�re clairement non NPOV. Et je maintiens que les d�lire de philippe sur les homosexuels, transexuels, juifs et autres me cassaient les couilles car ils n'avaient pas leur place dans wikipedia � ce titre.
Nod. I entirely agree with you. The encyclopedia should stay crystal clear. I trust wikipedians to keep it a very clean place, with a zero tolerance of anything that could disturb our peace. No racism, no sexism, no faschism, no extremism, no nuclearism, no anti-joseboverism, no anti-anarchism...pouah, horrible !
Thank god, we are still allowing sex-related articles ! Good anchor for reality.
Amicalement
Ant
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com