On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Anthere wrote:
Au passage je rappelle que les tribunaux français ont
condamnés yahoo pour la mise en vente d'objet nazis.
L'expression de théories, racistes, xénophobes,
antisémites peuvent faire l'objet de poursuites
pénales même si le serveur est hébergé aux États Unis.
Pour permettre à wikipedia d'être accessible, je me
permet donc de supprimer tout article qui contredisent
directement le premier et le deuxième article de la
déclaration universelle des droits de l'Homme :
By the way, I recall you that the French courts
condemned yahoo for the setting on sale of Nazis
object. The expression of racists, xenophobes,
anti-semites theories can be the subject of penal
continuations even if the server is hosted in the
United States. To allow wikipedia to be accessible, I
thus will delete any article which directly
contradicts the first and the second article of the
universal declaration of the humans right:
This is a point of view rather widely followed on the
"FRENCH" wikipedia (sorry canadian folks :-) - ey,
this is humour !)
Comments anyone ???
Shall we proceed on this way ?
Or not ?
To me it seems that any article which contradicts this declaration is
clearly either POV or simply wrong (the second if it pretends to make a
legal statement), and as such not suitable for Wikipedia. The only
objection which I would have is that 'delete' here is stated as the only
option. Better would be "edit and if the problem cannot be solved that way,
delete".
Andre Engels