On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Anthere wrote:
Au passage je rappelle que les tribunaux français ont condamnés yahoo pour la mise en vente d'objet nazis. L'expression de théories, racistes, xénophobes, antisémites peuvent faire l'objet de poursuites pénales même si le serveur est hébergé aux États Unis. Pour permettre à wikipedia d'être accessible, je me permet donc de supprimer tout article qui contredisent directement le premier et le deuxième article de la déclaration universelle des droits de l'Homme :
By the way, I recall you that the French courts condemned yahoo for the setting on sale of Nazis object. The expression of racists, xenophobes, anti-semites theories can be the subject of penal continuations even if the server is hosted in the United States. To allow wikipedia to be accessible, I thus will delete any article which directly contradicts the first and the second article of the universal declaration of the humans right:
This is a point of view rather widely followed on the "FRENCH" wikipedia (sorry canadian folks :-) - ey, this is humour !)
Comments anyone ???
Shall we proceed on this way ?
Or not ?
To me it seems that any article which contradicts this declaration is clearly either POV or simply wrong (the second if it pretends to make a legal statement), and as such not suitable for Wikipedia. The only objection which I would have is that 'delete' here is stated as the only option. Better would be "edit and if the problem cannot be solved that way, delete".
Andre Engels