--- Anthony DiPierro <wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
I'd certainly describe the exchange between Daniel
Mayer and Robert
Bamler to be arguing. But maybe I just misread things.
I was simply asking some legitimate questions; the first set was offlist, but when that
not answered adequately I restated the questions on the list. Robert interpreted my
an attack and assumed an argumentative tone. The questions were not an attack and I did
reciprocate in tone. An argument is a heated discussion between two or more people; if
person is heated, is it still an argument?
As for your other points; it is being worked on by our legal officer and his team.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around