It's wikimedia-L (not 1), FYI, and it's really for cross-project and movement wide discussion. The best place to raise your concerns is on-wiki. On to the subject...
I think everyone with enough experience with Wikipedia has heard this story before. We read it with a sigh and a sense of resignation, because there are a number of different problems at play and no one has really made any progress teasing them out, let alone solving them individually or collectively. I'll state the bottom line in two parts:
* First, Wikipedia is not an ideal forum for presenting new or not widely accepted knowledge. A full explanation of this would be familiar to most readers and take many paragraphs, so I'll leave that there.
* Second, improving content on Wikipedia can often be an exhausting battle; resolving disagreements is frequently a match of wills taking months or even years. It's crucial to involve other people and to adopt a gradualist, pragmatic approach.
It's these two things that often trip up experts, especially those with esoteric knowledge or confidence in new research. When you encounter resistance, you might interpret it as Wikipedia not wanting your help; that's not the case - so keep trying!