On 10/10/02 6:43 PM, "Brion VIBBER" brion@pobox.com wrote:
The Cunctator wrote:
On 10/10/02 3:47 PM, "Brion VIBBER" brion@pobox.com wrote:
I ain't heard nobody but Cunc object so far, and he doesn't say why. I await the reasons with bated breath,
http://www.nupedia.com/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2002-August/004031.html
I already cited that where you posted it at meta. It doesn't list any reasons against using an en.* URL for English articles, which is as you say "only a minor component" of the language integration.
For someone who says that "more effort should be put into building the cross-link capabilities" and "there should be the option of having Recent Changes show changes from any array of the languages", you're putting an awful lot of effort into stalling useful work to those ends by yakking on over this tiny thing.
That's a very interesting argument. If you consider it a tiny thing, then drop it.