On 10/10/02 6:43 PM, "Brion VIBBER" <brion(a)pobox.com> wrote:
The Cunctator wrote:
On 10/10/02 3:47 PM, "Brion VIBBER"
I ain't heard nobody but Cunc object so far,
and he doesn't say why. I
await the reasons with bated breath,
I already cited that where you posted it at meta. It doesn't list any
reasons against using an en.* URL for English articles, which is as you
say "only a minor component" of the language integration.
For someone who says that "more effort should be put into building the
cross-link capabilities" and "there should be the option of having
Recent Changes show changes from any array of the languages", you're
putting an awful lot of effort into stalling useful work to those ends
by yakking on over this tiny thing.
That's a very interesting argument. If you consider it a tiny thing, then