You didn't read Djordje's edit?
On 11/7/05, Mark Williamson node.ue@gmail.com wrote:
The whole reason this is so ridiculous is that you are threatening to remove your status simply b/c of this one thing.
No, this is important issue. Djordje is not dangerous person when we are talking about realiability of Wikipedia, but you are very dangerous, as well as people similar to you.
Without _any_ knowledge about situation (nor political nor linguistic), you are ready to believe in reasonable explained hoaxes. And this would not be the problem if you keep this for yourself. It becomes the big problem when you start to advocate for such things.
Note that I voted for opening Cantonese Wikipedia only because you and one person more explained that there is different writing system. As I don't know anything about linguistic situation in China, I trusted to both of you and considered that people who were opposing -- are Chinese nationalists. When I make relation between this case and Zlatiborian case, I am afraid that I voted for another hoax. Am I right?
And what about some Nigerian villages or ten names for one language in India?
So, this is the issue of scientific competency of Wikimedian projects. If we officially recognize that we are the part of that, we officially recognize such cases like "Zlatiborian Wikipedia".
And I don't want to be in conversation like:
Me: There are more then 100 different language editions of Wikipedia! Someone: And how many of them are Zlatiborian?
I don't want to be the part of scientific non-relevant project. This is not the issue of Zlatiborian.
Note, also, that Djordje is bureaucrat on Serbian Wikipedia.