Jens Frank wrote:
I think Jimbo unbanned her. But I think it was a fault. Frau Jonat is doing what she's done before (List in no particular order):
- Shows disrespect against the Polish national border:
http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Wolin&diff=452458&oldid=...
- reverting articles to a status that was considered
wrong by other experts, without providing prove or arguments for her position http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Boleslaus_I_of_Poland&diff=4...
- Changing articles from NPOV
http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=History_of_Lithuania&diff=45...
- Articles which do not cover the subject
http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Galindan_language&oldid=4560...
I've reviewed these articles, and although some of the changes seem debatable, or involve exchanging one POV for another, that is nothing unusual in the thrust and parry of debate. To say that adding the single word "current" to "Polish border" is a disrespect of Polish borders makes arguments out of nothing. The addition is at worst a redundency of trivial importance.
If temporary bans are to have any value, fair-mindedness demands that when the offender returns to the community her contributions be judged with the same objectivity that would be applied to any other contributors. There is no need to look at her contributions through a microscope for every tiny point that you may find offensive. If you look hard enough you can find that in anybody's contributions.
Eclecticology