TL;DR wall of text amirite?
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Chitu Okoli <Chitu.Okoli(a)concordia.ca>wrote;wrote:
[Apologies for cross-posting; this same e-mail is
being sent to
wikipedia-l, WikiEN-l and foundation-l]
Hi everyone,
We are a research group conducting a systematic literature review on
Wikipedia-related peer-reviewed academic studies published in the English
language. (Although there are many excellent studies in other languages, we
unfortunately do not have the resources to systematically review these at
any kind of acceptable scholarly level. Also, our study is about Wikipedia
only, not about other Wikimedia Foundation projects. However, we do include
studies about other language Wikipedias, as long as the studies are
published in English.) We have completed a search using many major databases
of scholarly research. We've posted separate messages to wiki-research-l
related to this literature review.
We have identified over 2,100 peer-reviewed studies that have "wikipedia",
"wikipedian", or "wikipedians" in their title, abstract or keywords.
As this
number of studies is far too large for conducting a review synthesis, we
have decided to focus only on peer-reviewed journal publications and
doctoral theses; we identified 638 such studies. In addition, we identified
around 1,500 peer-reviewed conference articles.
We hope that our review would provide useful insights for both wikipedians
and researchers. (Although we know that most Wikipedia researchers are also
wikipedians, we define wikipedian or "Wikipedia practitioner" here as
someone involved in the Wikipedia project who is not also a scholarly
researcher.) In particular, here is a list of some of the research questions
we are investigating in our review that are particularly pertinent to
wikipedians (you can check wiki-research-l for the full set of research
questions):
1. What high-quality research has been conducted with Wikipedia as a major
topic or data source? As mentioned in the introductory e-mail, we have
already identified over 2,100 studies, though we will only analyze 638 of
them in depth. We will group the articles by field of study.
2. What research questions have been asked by various sources, both
academic scholarly and practitioner? We want to know both the subjects that
the existing research has covered, and also catalogue key questions that
practitioners would like to be answered, whether or not academic research
has broached these questions. Also, we categorize the research questions
based on their purposes.
6. What conclusions have been made from existing research? That is, what
questions from RQ2 have been answered, and what are these answers?
7. What questions from RQ2 are left unanswered? (These present directions
for future research.)
Regarding our RQ2, on the research questions that have been asked, we want
to identify not only the research questions that we extract from the
articles, but also what questions are of interest that have not been
studied. For this, we have identified a few banks of Wikipedia-related
research questions.
We are most of all interested in questions that wikipedians are asking,
other than what researchers are asking. There is an old list of research
questions or goals at
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Research_Goals; these
questions are about Wikimedia Foundation projects in general, though
Wikipedia is of course included. Could you please review this list and
update that page directly with any additional questions? Alternately, you
could reply us directly, and we could update the list.
Another bank of questions we have identified is more directed towards
academics and researchers:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wikidemia#Research_Quest….
We have asked the wiki-research-l subscribers to update that list. We will
draw from both lists for our bank of research questions.
Thanks for your help.
Chitu Okoli, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada
(
http://chitu.okoli.org/professional/open-content/wikipedia-and-open-content…
)
Arto Lanamäki, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway
Mohamad Mehdi, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada
Mostafa Mesgari, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l