On 21 Oct 2003, Erik Moeller wrote:
At the third
reiteration, the information ceases to be useful, or
interesting. How many times do you wish to cite sources stating that the
Missionaries Of Charity took in a lot of money and were pretty shifty about
where it went?
Redundancy is obviously unnecessary, however, if separate incidents are
described, that is not redundancy but strengthening of the case, as any
lawyer knows.
But we are not trying to _make_ a case. It seems that you want to have a
trial on Mother Teresa, where you give the prosecutor's case, and someone
else is to do the defense case. We are not. We should say that there are
critics, and outline their points of criticism, but then in my opinion we
are done. There is no need to specify all kinds of proof for these criticisms.
That's not an encyclopedia's job. That's a job for a POV publication.
Andre Engels