On 11/2/05, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)ctelco.net> wrote:
This is particularly important in the case of
disruptive users who an
administrator has blocked for a long period of time, perhaps
indefinitely. Any administrator who feels it is appropriate can
unblock them, but if no one out of hundreds of administrators is
willing to, perhaps it is best to leave it in place.
The downside is that some of those blocked don't know how to ask to
be unblocked as perhaps they would be unblocked if they knew better
who to appeal to.
Fred
It is important for administrators to both review each other and be
open to criticism.
Generally, I stepped aside and encouraged the other admin to revise my
decision when there is a difference of opinion. Admins who can't
tolerate to be reviewed or criticised maybe shouldn't be an admins.
What really irritates me is when an admin modifies another admin's
block without discussion.