Thus if we
were to use the Library of Congress
letter classifications
(which has the benefit of being usable without
reinventing the wheel)
all articles concerned with mathematics would
receive a "QA" code. A
person interested in mathematics could add the
"QA" code to his
preferences, and on request would be able to
receive a list of the
recent changes in articles about mathematics.
Having several boxes
associated with an article, allows for the fact
that some articles may
be relevant to more than one category. An
article
on mathematical
applications in psychology would have both a
"QA"
and a "BF" code.
Hum, this made me think over foul langage again, and
mostly about "some" of the articles, that might be
considered offensive to some (ref eclecticology and
kid use at school).
Offensive articles (or thought to be...) could be part
of the classification (say, classified XX). Then, it
would be possible to disconnect view of these
articles.
* either by default (I definitly don't support that)
* or possible to disconnect them in the prefs
The second option could be used for "educational"
accounts, and relieve educators from the fear to see
an article dealing on "fuck" on the screen.
The offensive articles could disappear from the links
(is that possible ?), but mostly from the search
function (I am sure typing "fuck" in the search box is
among the 10 tries of a kid...)
We could put tmc in the offensive xx category ? :-)))
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos