Wikipedia-l December 2006

wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org

49 participants
22 discussions

Re: [Wikipedia-l] multi-headed VANDALS
by Daniel Mayer 18 Jan '23

18 Jan '23

On Sunday 28 July 2002 03:00 am, The Cunctator wrote: > What are the articles this person has been changing? For 66.108.155.126: 20:08 Jul 27, 2002 Computer 20:07 Jul 27, 2002 Exploit 20:07 Jul 27, 2002 AOL 20:05 Jul 27, 2002 Hacker 20:05 Jul 27, 2002 Leet 20:03 Jul 27, 2002 Root 20:02 Jul 27, 2002 Hacker 19:59 Jul 27, 2002 Hacker 19:58 Jul 27, 2002 Hacker 19:54 Jul 27, 2002 Principle of least astonishment 19:54 Jul 27, 2002 Hacker 19:52 Jul 27, 2002 Trance music 19:51 Jul 27, 2002 Trance music For 208.24.115.6: 20:20 Jul 27, 2002 Hacker For 141.157.232.26: 20:19 Jul 27, 2002 Hacker Most of these were complete replacements with discoherent statements. Such as "TAP IS THE ABSOLUTE DEFINITION OF THE NOUN HACKER" for Hacker. For the specifics follow http://www.wikipedia.com/wiki/Special:Ipblocklist and look at the contribs. --mav

2 1

Language policy agreement in the Norwegian Wikipedia community
by Bjarte Sørensen 01 Apr '12

01 Apr '12

Dear all, Most of you would be aware of some of the discussions that have occurred around Wikipedia in the Norwegian languages. Since the last round of discussions on this list, there has been a lot of internal debate, as well as what seems to be a fairly widely accepted agreement following voting. This e-mail intends to, after a brief recap on Norwegian language and wikipedia issues, take those interested through the latest development and will stake out the road ahead. It is also intended to inform the international community about the current agreement on no.wikipedia, so as to prevent misunderstandings in the future. Finally, we will mention an unfortunate reaction to the vote by a small number of users at the Norwegian Bokmål/Riksmål (no:) wikipedia who want to disregard the result of the voting and are planning to create a _third_ Norwegian wikipedia with the sole mission of mixing the contents of the two current Norwegian versions. == A short language history of Norway == Spoken Norwegian ("norsk") (ISO 639-2 alpha-2 code "no") is in a fairly unique situation compared to most other languages of the world in that it has two widely accepted written standards, Bokmål (ISO 639-2 alpha-2 code "nb") and Nynorsk (ISO 639-2 alpha-2 code "nn"). By national legislation they are both regarded as official written forms of Norwegian. In addition, many people still make a distinction between Bokmål and its precursor which still is in use, Riksmål. Briefly speaking, Bokmål and Riksmål are descendants of the Danish written language. Until the 1800s, Danish was the only widely used written language in Norway as a result of four centuries of union with Denmark. With increasing independence came a wish to norwegianise the Danish standard, with Knud Knudsen at the forefront for changing parts of the vocabulary and orthographics. Thus, Riksmål, and later Bokmål, resulted. These forms together are today probably used by about 90% of Norway's population, or somewhere around 3,500,000 people. Parallel to this development, a new written standard was created by Ivar Aasen. He travelled extensively throughout Norway, and based his new language, landsmål, on the grammar and vocabulary of dialect samples from around the country. This was later renamed Nynorsk. Modern Nynorsk differs significantly from modern Bokmål, and may be linguistically looked upon as as different (or as similar if you like) as Swedish is to Danish. For English or Dutch/German speakers, the differences may be likened to those between (Lowland) Scots and English or Low German and Dutch. Today it is estimated that about 500,000-600,000 people have Nynorsk as their first written language. More information about the Norwegian language history can be found in English, German, French, Spanish or Portuguese on the website of the Norwegian Language Council: http://www.sprakrad.no/templates/Page.aspx?id=653 == A short history of Wikipedia in Norwegian == The first Norwegian wikipedia started 26 November 2001 on the subdomain no.wikipedia.org. As most wikipedias, its contributor and article count started really picking up around the end of 2003. At the time, it accepted all written standards of Norwegian, although the amount of Nynorsk was minimal. There were already several debates about the feasibilty and appropriateness of keeping the two languages united on one Wikipedia. On 31 July 2004 a Wikipedia for Nynorsk was created. The creation of nn:, however, split the community at no: wikipedia. Many felt that given that Nynorsk now had its own wikipedia, no: should become a Bokmål/Riksmål Wikipedia only. Others disapproved and claimed that there was no need to change and that it should continue its language policy of accepting all and keep its interwiki link name of "Norsk". Nynorsk Wikipedia soon proved a success, as it within the next few months gathered several people who had felt uncomfortable in the (mainly) Bokmål environment at no:. The name displayed in interwiki links became "Norsk (nynorsk)" (languages are not spelt with upper case in Norwegian). To date it continues to be one of the fastest growing wikipedias, with a steady article increase, now at over 6000 articles and >50 editors with more than 10 edits since arrival. == Votes == The issue of no:'s language policy has come up time and again, and a vote was held in March ([[:no:Wikipedia:Målform]]) as to which policy to adapt. Independent of the method of the tally (whether or not to include new contributors etc.) there was a majority for switching to a Bokmål/Riksmål only language policy (50% for Bokmål/Riksmål, 43.2% for Bokmål/Riksmål/Nynorsk/Høgnorsk, and 6.8% for the official variants Bokmål/Nynorsk only). Following this result, there is now going to be a vote on which interwiki link name will most appropriately reflect the current language policy of no:. The result of this vote will most likely be either "Norsk (bokmål)" or "Norsk (bokmål/riksmål)". Understandably, there has also been a debate as to whether the subdomain should change from "no" to "nb", as this is the correct representation of Bokmål according to ISO 639-2. However, there is some resentment towards such a move and currently a general acceptance in letting the Bokmål wikipedia stay at "no". The alternative some have suggested is a server-side redirect from "no" to "nb", in the same way that "nb" today is a server-side redirect to the equivalent page on "no". == Summary of the problem == Unfortunately, a small group of users (who all write Bokmål/Riksmål) are ignoring the results from the vote, and are claiming they want to re-establish a wikipedia for all written standards of Norwegian. They claim they have been in touch with people centrally in Wikimedia (developers? stewards?) and that they have so far received positive comments. With this email, we would like to state the fact that there have been no official decisions about creating a third Norwegian wikipedia containing both Bokmål and Nynorsk, it is merely an unofficial initiative from a small group of users which started a sign-on list at [[:no:Bruker:Norsk_Wikipedia]]. A spontaneous list with signatures against this activity was immediately created at [[:no:Wikipedia-diskusjon:Fellesnorsk]]. The process of creating a third Norwegian wikipedia has not gone through a voting process in any of the two existing Norwegian wikipedias (no: and nn:) and can not be considered as a decision by the Norwegian Wikipedia community. We believe the creation of a third wikipedia under the Wikimedia foundation would have a serious and unfortunate impact on the existing wikipedias in Norwegian, no: and nn:, and would undermine Wikipedia's reputation in Norway. This being said, we are all for extensive co- operation between the four Scandinavian language wikipedias (including Swedish and Danish), as evident by the recent creation of [[:meta:Skanwiki]], the Scandinavian meta-pages, and the use of featured articles from neighbour wikipedias. == Conclusion == Hopefully, this letter will help people better understand the complicated language situation of the Norwegian Wikipedia community, so as to give a background on which discussion can take place on this list in the future, such as the inevitable debate following a possible request for a re-establishment of the common (and third!) Norwegian Wikipedia. >From the community of no.wikipedia.org and nn.wikipedia.org, Bjarte Sørensen [[:meta:User:BjarteSorensen]] (Administrator/bureaucrat on nn:) Lars Alvik [[:no:User:Profoss]] (Administrator/bureaucrat on no:) Øyvind A. Holm [[:no:User:Sunny256]] (Administrator on no:) Onar Vikingstad [[:no:User:Vikingstad]] (Administrator on no:) Jon Harald Søby [[:no:User:Jhs]] (Administrator on no:) Chris Nyborg [[:no:User:Cnyborg]] (Administrator on no:) Guttorm Flatabø [[:no:User:Dittaeva]] (Administrator on nn:) Gunleiv Hadland [[:meta:User:Gunnernett]] (Administrator on nn:) Jarle Fagerheim [[:nn:User:Jarle]] (Administrator on nn:) Øyvind Jo Heimdal Eik [[:en:User:Pladask]] (Administrator on nn: and no:) Kristian André Gallis [[:nn:User:Kristaga]] Vegard Wærp [[:no:User:Vegardw]] Nina Aldin Thune [[:no:User:Nina]] Thor-Rune Hansen [[:no:User:ThorRune]] Claes Tande [[:no:User:Ctande]] Arnt-Erik Krokaa [[:no:User:AEK]] Rune Sattler [[:no:User:Shauni]]

9 14

Wikimedia Open Access Chat
by Erik Moeller 04 Jan '08

04 Jan '08

I would like to invite you to join a chat about the relationship between the Wikimedia community and the Open Access movement in scientific publishing. This will explore issues of licensing, content sharing, technology, and hopefully result in mutual commitments to collaborate. In a nutshell: December 17, 2006; irc.freenode.net; 21:00 UTC; #openaccess Please see: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Open_Access_chat for more (including a link to a web interface for accessing the IRC channel). I would appreciate it if you would add yourself to the "I want to attend!" list on the page, so we have an idea how many people are coming. -- Peace & Love, Erik DISCLAIMER: This message does not represent an official position of the Wikimedia Foundation or its Board of Trustees.

4 5

Re: [Wikipedia-l] New ideas for fundraising needed. Start here! (F.B. Dýrfjörð)
by Friðrik Bragi Dýrfjörð 31 Dec '06

31 Dec '06

I haven't fallowed the discussion so I might be repeating an old idea, if so just ignore my comment. In any case this is an old idea, this is a business model you have probably seen before if you are familiar with The Hunger Site (thehungersite.com) and The Million Dollar Homepage (milliondollarhomepage.com). I was thinking we could have a button on the fundraising-page that people would be asked to click if they wanted to support Wikimedia (this is not advertising). Clicking that button would send you to a side project of the Foundation (hopefully with a special domain name) which would essentially be a page full of ads like the Million Dollar Homepage. So in this way we do not advertise on Wikipedia but instead offer people who whish to support the Foundation to support us in this way (and in this way make use of our traffic). - F.B. Dýrfjörð

2 1

New ideas for fundraising needed. Start here!
by David Gerard 31 Dec '06

31 Dec '06

On 28/12/06, Teun Spaans <teun.spaans(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/28/06, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On 28/12/06, Teun Spaans <teun.spaans(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > 6) Has there ever been an open call to all wikipedians to provide > > > suggestions to the foundationboard of ways to receive money? > > Does continuously saying "our traffic level is stupidly high and costs > > a fortune / everyone at our web ranking has an actual budget and > > income stream / we're operating on a shoestring / we're desperately in > > need of cash" count? > No. > Did I really have to say that? ;-) Then take it as read ;-) Perhaps we can get going on creative new ideas for fundraising! Post your idea below: ---> - d.

8 12

NeOpuntia
by Okky Sulistijo 31 Dec '06

31 Dec '06

What is NeOpuntia? NeOpuntia® is a natural lipophilic fiber made from dehydrated oval leaves (also called pads) of the Opuntia ficus indica cactus via a long development & patented process backed by strong scientific research. Developed by French scientists, NeOpuntia is the first effective vegetable fat-blocker. This 100% green and natural high quality ingredient enables you to lose weight safely, without starving yourself or force yourself to stick to a low-fat diet. Weight-loss cactus Originally native to Mexico, Opuntia ficus-indica (Indian Fig Opuntia) is a species of cactus, grown for the large, sweet fruits, called tunas, which are available in local and commercial markets worldwide. Most culinary references to the prickly pear are referring to this plant. The name tuna is also used for this cactus, and for Opuntia in general. The cactus leaves of Opuntia ficus-indica have been traditionally eaten in Mexico and southern Europe for many years. The cactus pads also provided a source of sticky binding material for adobe bricks during construction. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

2 1

(no subject)
by gabriela sanhuezagaray 29 Dec '06

29 Dec '06

Solo les envio este email. para confirmar el recibo de los suyos a la esta fecha. Si no me comunico con Uds. es porque estoy desarrollando unos proyectos. A penas pueda me comunicare con Uds. Saludos Gaby _________________________________________________________________ Charla con tus amigos en línea mediante MSN Messenger: http://messenger.latam.msn.com/

1 0

Editing time statistics
by Jacky PB 28 Dec '06

28 Dec '06

Hello everybody, First of all, I wish all of you a very happy new year. Now, my question: Are there statistics on how much time users spend editing wikipedia? For instance, when a user edits at least once every 15-25 minutes for 10 hours, I would say he/she spent 10 hours editing, which is cool. I saw people doing better, and regularly. These people are the true pillars of wikipedia. Yours, Dpotop __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

3 2

Registering www.wikipedia.cat for ca.wikipedia.org
by Claudi Meneghin 23 Dec '06

23 Dec '06

Hi all, I would like to suggest to register www.wikipedia.cat for ca.wikipedia.org; however I am not sure that this is the right place. Thnk you. Claudi --------------------------------- Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses.

4 3

Re: [Wikipedia-l] Begging letters on our blogs?
by Michael Snow 22 Dec '06

22 Dec '06

J.L.W.S. The Special One wrote: > I remember reading a report in the Signpost which says that Wikipedia > could earn over $500 million if it used contextual ads. Please, if you're going to cite my work in making the controversial argument that Wikipedia should carry advertising, at least get your information right. The Signpost did not report "that Wikipedia could earn over $500 million if it used contextual ads." The Signpost reported about some people doing back-of-the-napkin analysis, and they didn't come up with $500 million in revenue either. Even the biggest public booster of such advertising, the inimitable Jason Calacanis, was only plugging for $100 million as the annual revenue potential. Perhaps you've gotten confused over the critical distinction between income and valuation? Or if you were relying solely on memory, please avoid that bad habit (responsible for quite a few Wikipedia errors), especially when the facts require such a trivial effort to check. --Michael Snow

3 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

Wikipedia-l December 2006