In a message dated 12/9/2010 2:51:39 AM Pacific Standard Time, jamesmikedupont@googlemail.com writes:
yes it would be great. As i said, it could just include all pages listed as REF pages and that would allow people to review the results and find pages that should not belong.
We also need to cache all these pages, best would be with a revision history. It should be similar to or using archive.org.
We would not be able to do that for copyright reasons. Some if not most of the refs are still under copyright, we cannot make copies of those pages.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:02 PM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 12/9/2010 2:51:39 AM Pacific Standard Time, jamesmikedupont@googlemail.com writes:
yes it would be great. As i said, it could just include all pages listed as REF pages and that would allow people to review the results and find pages that should not belong.
We also need to cache all these pages, best would be with a revision history. It should be similar to or using archive.org.
We would not be able to do that for copyright reasons. Some if not most of the refs are still under copyright, we cannot make copies of those pages.
Google does it, archive.org (wayback machine) does it, we can copy them for caching and searching i assume. we are not changing the license, but just preventing the information from disappearing on us.
mike
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org