I had a rather different impression of events around Pieter. I remember several times
where he got admins on his case because he nominated copyvios for deletion which said
admins had uploaded to Commons.
I'm also not sure whether a sarcastic reference to German efficiency in a talk page
discussion qualifies as a racist remark. Etc.
Andreas
--- On Mon, 6/12/10, Adam Cuerden <cuerden(a)gmail.com> wrote:
From: Adam Cuerden <cuerden(a)gmail.com>
Subject: [Foundation-l] Pieter Kuiper
To: foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Monday, 6 December, 2010, 20:25
It concerns me greatly that Commons
seems unable to deal with a user who, at
various times, has attacked a Jew with anti-semitic
cartoons, has thrown
racist abuse at a German theen harassed that user - and
still has numbers of
admins willing to unblock him, simply because he does
supposedly good work
on Deletion reviews. Diod I mention the Jew was blocked for
several months
for A SINGLE COMPLAINT ABOUT HIS BEHAVIOUR?
Pieter has harassed numerous users away from contributing
to Wikipedia. That
he is still editing after all he's done is disgraceful.
Commons'
administration has clearly failed, and failed horribly.
A list of evidence follows:
The most recent incident was racist abuse against a German
user, followed by
harassment
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Martin_H.&curi…
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Farrel.jpg
and
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Tiotio.jpg
The report, which before I noticed and acted upon it was
full of people
claiming that racist abuse was fine, and that Pieter was
being harassed by
being called out on it, is here:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Use…
Pieter has a block log as long as your arm:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User%3A…
However, he also has an unblock log, where the same few
admins constantly
unblock him, without insisting on a change in the
problematic behaviour.
This is a user who gets serial warnings and second chances,
all the time
becoming bolder and bolder.
A few past incidents will suffice:
The Wall of Shame incident, and the Havang_nl harassment.
Pieter's modus operandi has been to attempt to harass
admins who do things
he dislikes by scouring their image uploads to find
something to request
deletion on. The validity of these deletions varies in
quality, and are
often grasping at straws. Several of the blocks in the
block log are for
this.
One of the clearest incidents was when he attempted to
refight old battles
where the DR had gone against him, attacking the admins who
uploaded and the
admins who closed the DRs as keep. Here's the wall of shame
he created.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3APieter_Kuiper&act…
The next few edits are him editwarring to keep the Wall of
Shame up. He got
blocked for this. He made an unblock, and Havang_nl denied
it. So he
promptly attacked Havang.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APieter_Kuiper&am…
----
I believe there were other incidents involving antisemitic
cartoons being
used to attack Mbz1, a Jew, but one can be found here,
where he constantly
insists on including a cartoon which he knows will upset
said Jew.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pieter_Kuiper/Arch…
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pieter_Kuiper/Arch…
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pieter_Kuiper/Arch…
this was followed by a WP:POINTy FPC nomination
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:…
It's clear that Commons cannot handle him, and I beseech
the Foundation to
step in, investigate the matter, and deal with it. I also
think that every
administrator invoilved in defending him, and encouraging
the harassment of
other users, should lose their admin rights.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l