For some reason the 2014 WLM contest in the UK has not been included in
the reported data.
2 May 2015 12:26
it seems that the WMF evaluation department has once again put
together an evaluation of Wiki Loves Monuments. Out of curiosity, were
any of the organizers involved in this? A quick glance suggests some
factual errors, and again a big focus on assuming WLM is a consistent
project, that is similar in each country (while in reality it is a
diverse collection of projects, tailored to the needs of each country,
by its community) and with a focus towards number crunching.
Statements that begin with 'the average Wiki Loves Monuments
implementation/contest' make my eyes bleed... Did anyone make a more
thorough analysis of the report?
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list