Hi all,
it
seems that the WMF evaluation department has once again put together an
evaluation of Wiki Loves Monuments. Out of curiosity, were any of the
organizers involved in this? A quick glance suggests some factual
errors, and again a big focus on assuming WLM is a consistent project,
that is similar in each country (while in reality it is a diverse
collection of projects, tailored to the needs of each country, by its
community) and with a focus towards number crunching.
Statements
that begin with 'the average Wiki Loves Monuments
implementation/contest' make my eyes bleed... Did anyone make a more
thorough analysis of the report?
Best,
Lodewijk