I agree with this. If the community is more or less identical for both, it might send a wrong (discouraging) signal to only approve one of the two projects. best, jan
Am 10.11.2020 03:03, schrieb Vito Genovese:
Provided that they complete the most used core message translations by the time they get final approval, I support the approval of both projects. It is evident that the two projects share a small but sturdy community, so it shouldn't be a problem for them to maintain both projects.
Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com, 9 Kas 2020 Pzt, 08:33 tarihinde şunu yazdı:
Hoi, There are two arguments, you only address one. Thanks, GerardM
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 07:46, Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
Gerard, we already discussed this: Wiktionary hasn't yet been replaced by Wikidata and won't be any time soon, so this argument is irrelevant.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 08:12, מאת Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com:
Hoi, From my point of view, depending on what project, we always followed the notion that for a second project we require more quality in localisations. So no, first Wikipedia then Wiktionary. Wiktionary as a project is being made redundant by the lexical support in Wikidata, so giving it a priority is wrong. So even with my love for Wiktionary, no rather not as a first if at all. Wikisource is a totally different proposition. Thanks, GerardM
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 06:26, Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
I'd just approve both, but Wiktionary first and Wikipedia later is OK, too.
I should mention that over the last year and a half I've been speaking to them and providing them tech support, mostly for translatewiki activity. Their relevant questions caused me to improve some things in translatewiki's configuration and documentation in a way that hopefully makes working there easier for everyone.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 04:49, מאת MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com:
The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&...
This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni
I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity:
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&...
I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom